Saturday, April 30, 2016

Scroll Blank - Keystone

Scroll Blank - Keystone


figure 1

Description:

Scroll blank of a church in the middle of an inital ‘O’. Inspired by a late 1 5th Century, Dutch manuscript. Gouache and ink on Arches 40 pound, hot-pressed, cotton paper. Produced larger than the original (9x1 3in vs. 5.4x7.4in)

Details of the original image:

Illuminated Manuscript, Duke Albrecht’s Table of Christian Faith (Winter Part), Confession to a pope, Walters Art Museum Ms. W.171, fol. 117v

Shelf mark: W.171

Manuscript: Duke Albrecht’s Table of Christian faith (winter part)

Text title: Tafel van den Kersten ghelove (winterstuc)

Author: As-written name: Dirc van Delf 

Abstract: This illuminated manuscript is a document of the first importance in the history of Dutch manuscript illumination and contains an important medieval Dutch devotional text. The Tafel van den Kersten ghelove is a compendium of Christian knowledge written by a learned Dominican, Dirc van Delf. The text is in two parts, one for winter, one for summer. This manuscript is of the winter part and is incomplete, omitting the prologue and chapters 13, 14, and 35-57. The arms of the Bavarian counts of Holland and the kneeling owner on fol. 1r indicate that this manuscript was the actual copy prepared for the dedicatee of the text, Albrecht of Bavaria, Count of Holland, from the original text of his chaplain, and is therefore to be dated to 1404 at the latest, when Albrecht died. The manuscript contains 165 folios and thirty-five historiated initials. 

Date: 1400-1404 CE

Origin: Utrecht, Netherlands

Form: Book

Genre: Theological
Language: The primary language in this manuscript is Dutch; Flemish.

Support material: Parchment. Fine to medium-weight parchment, well prepared; visible pricking marks 

Extent: Foliation: i+165+i. Modern pencil foliation in upper right corners of rectos (followed here); fifteenth-century foliation at center of top margins of rectos; gap in latter foliation revealing the loss of seven leaves between present folios 24 and 25, which contained chapters 13 and 14 by Daniels’ numeration (evidently preceding his chapter 12 in this manuscript) 

Dimensions: 13.7 cm wide by 18.8 cm high

Written surface: 8.5 cm wide by 11.5 cm high

LayoutColumns: 1

Ruled lines: 24

Lines ruled in brown ink

Contents: fols. 1r - 165v: 

Title: Tafel van den Kersten ghelove (winterstuc) 

Rubric: Van gode vander godheit en vander triniteyt. Primum capittelum.

Incipit: Die prophete micheas seyt wt den monde godes

Text note: References in this description of the text are to Daniels’ edition of 1939 (see bibliography); text lacks the prologue, as well as chapters 13 and 14, and is incomplete at the end, lacking chapters 35-57; order of chapters 23-24 inverted 

Hand note: Written in Gothic bookhand; instructions to the rubricator in tiny noting hand found in columns in the gutter (e.g. fols. 43r, 52v-53r, and 81r); possible second hand found on the last folio of text (fol. 165r) in a more angular version of the same script 

Decoration note: Miniatures by two painters: artist A (fols. 1r-110r) with soft and painterly style, depending very little on outlines and artist B (fols. 112v-156r) using stronger, brighter colors (artist A also illuminated an initial in the four-volume Bible for the Carthusians of Utrecht [Brussels, Bibl. Roy. Mss. 106, 107, 204, and 205]); historiated initials at the opening of each chapter (four for Daniels’ chapter 1) (10-15 lines); thirty-five further large historiated initials; smaller initials in gold or blue with violet or red marginal penwork; bar borders with trefoil foliage of red, blue, and gold springing from the initials into the entire left margin, the vine turning into the top and bottom margins; chapter captions in red; Latin words in text underlined in red; paragraph marks in red or blue; capital letters within the text picked out with red strokes; instructions for rubrics visible in the gutter of the binding in very small lettering; instructions to the illuminator in Dutch in another hand visible at lower margins on fols. 105r and 110r. [1]


figure 2

Technique:

This project was an attempt to reproduce this beautiful manuscript. This was going to be completed with gold leaf, but, as I am still learning how to gild (figure 3) [2], I used gold gouache. In fact, I used gouache and ink on paper rather than vellum and period pigments as I am still a novice and have not mastered the basic materials. Working from a high resolution image of the manuscript [3], I removed the background colors and printed out the image. The design was transferred to the paper by tracing over a light box. I decided to make this scroll because I liked the image and wanted to see if I could reproduce it. While no project or assignment was in mind, for this scroll, it can, certainly, be used for any purpose. [4] Instead of making an exact copy of the original image, and colors, I used them as a guide to help me select new colors that would stand out better. I started with a light wash to all areas that required color, following up, after allowing enough time for the paint to dry, with darker shades. I applied the paint so that if the virtual light source came from the upper, left-hand corner of the page, the darkest shades would fall into the right most corners, producing shadows.

figure 3

The background of the ‘O’, leaves and the border were painted with gold gouache and outlined with black ink: no highlighting or shading was used. Several layers of gold paint were used to make the objects stand out. Instead of reproducing the colors of the original manuscript, or more accurately, the hues of the manuscript’s colors. I imagined what the manuscript might have looked like 600 years ago, with the reds and blues bright and vibrant; before those colors had had a chance to age and oxidize. To that end, I used bright crimson and blue gouache for the border and church, and bright emerald for the lawn. These colors were further brightened by the white highlights and “mortar”.

Once the all of the paint had dried, I outlined all of the sections with black ink to make the image stand out.

figure 4

References:

Flikr Photostream for Caleb Reynolds. https://www.flickr.com/photos/calebreynolds/9510628001/in/album-72157647364520813/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/calebreynolds/8471091955/in/album-72157647364520813/

Flickr Photostream for Walters Art Museum Ms. W.171. https://www.flickr.com/photos/medmss/5447703235/



Walters Art Museum: Digitized Walters Manuscripts: Walters Ms. W.171, Duke Albrecht’s Table of Christian faith (winter part).  http://www.thedigitalwalters.org/Data/WaltersManuscripts/html/W171/description.html


[1] http://www.thedigitalwalters.org/Data/WaltersManuscripts/html/W1 71 /description.html 
[2] I was having issues with the glue and did not want to risk having all of the gold leaf fall off while being judged.
[3] Provided by The Walters Art Museum’s Flikr page.
[4] It was used for a backlog Keystone scroll. See figure 4.



---------------------------------------------------

This scroll blank was made for the A&S competition at The Lady Marys Memorial Tournament in 2013, which I won. Yea!

I really like how this scroll came out and I'm happy that I was able to use it for for a friend.

Thursday, April 28, 2016

The first rule of Scribal Club

The first rule of Scribal Club is that we do not talk about who our assignments are for.


The second rule of Scribal Club is that we start our assignments weeks in advance so that we have time to fix any problems.

The third rule of Scribal Club is that we do not complain when the wordsmith goes overboard and presents you with elebenty billion words to squeeze into a 2x4" space. Particularly when you are your own wordsmith.

I knocked out three scrolls, this evening and boy, does my hand hurt. Obviously I was gripping the pen way too hard: one of my many bad habits of writing. The picture, above, shows the one scroll where I don't mind showing off the text: it is for the Hael chiv. champion. I do like word wrapping the text around the image elements, but, in retrospect, I should have put the blank space for the name at the top of the scroll. Oh, well. Perhaps I can convince our B&B to pick a champion with a name no longer than three inches.

Today, I received a package from John Neal Booksellers: a ten pack of pergamenata. I have an idea for a project for next year's Ice Dragon Pentathalon and I want to spend some time working with pergamenta before I do the scroll. Yes, I think it's time that I, once again, enter the full Pentathlon. I plan on a scroll, a beverage, a baked good, a research paper and I plan on teaching myself to make my own sugar. How hard could it be? If plants can do it, I can figure it out.

Wednesday, April 20, 2016

Dragonslayer



Finally, Disney's Dragonslayer (1981) was released on DVD. I had fond memories of the movie but hadn't seen it since high school. So, as soon as I saw it on Amazon, I had to buy it. This past weekend, I sat down and watched it. Did the movie live up to my memories? Yes. Yes it did. While this was a Disney movie, it is not a kids film. There are no musical numbers, no sidekicks there solely for comic relief. People die and the movie doesn't try to hide the deaths.

While the rear projection and matte shots are dated (particularly on a HD TV), the practical effects are still phenomenal. Vermithrax Pejorative is still one of the best movie dragons I've ever seen: from the stop motion model, to the life size claws, to the 40 foot full sized puppet and to the flamethrowers the effects team used to give the dragon its fire. It's not a perfect movie, but it is a good, fantasy movie. Much better than most, even ones made in last few years (*cough* Dungeons and Dragons *cough cough*).

I do have some issues with the movie, though. The movie takes place in the "dark ages", before Christianity became wide-spread. The costuming is nicer than most fantasy movies and better than most period films, but not perfect. The sword vs spear duel towards the end was terrible. The mirror like sword blades, a-la Excalibur, are a distraction. And too much furry boots and studded leather.

The dragon ran rampant throughout the kingdom. The King struck a bargain with the beast: two virgins a year and the dragon will stay in its lair. The virgins are selected by lottery from young maidens throughout the kingdom. After years of sacrificing young girls, a group of peasants set out to hire a powerful wizard to slay the dragon, and plot happens. The wizard is killed, but his apprentice swears to finish the job. The spear, Dragonslayer, is really, really cool and I wouldn't mind having one, but it would cost more than a mortgage payment.

The movie is good; as good as I remember it, but I have a major problem with it. How can a creature the size of a city bus, that flies, survive on two 90-100# girls per year. Warm blooded critters need, on average, 10 times their body weight in food per year: The bigger the critter, the bigger the pile of food required to keep it alive and mobile. How can a dragon live on only two people per year? If their metabolism is that efficient, why would dragons be a problem? They would eat a person (or a cow) and sleep for six months. What is the deal? And don't say magic. Everyone says magic. Is the kingdom giving the sacrificial virgins a last meal of enriched uranium? That would explain the fiery breath. And Godzilla. Is there something about virginity that powers dragons better than sheep or cows? There are no dragons anymore, so we can't ever find out. But until we figure out the thermodynamics of dragon, they will continue to fascinate us. In the mean time, check out Dragonslayer.

Thursday, April 7, 2016

Just in case you are stuck for an insult.

Randomly pick one from each column.

Thank you, Will Shakespeare. The man sure knew how to insult someone. Why call someone an asshole when you can call them an infectious, beef-witted foot-licker.