Saturday, December 26, 2015

Mint Mead

This is documentation that I wrote for an entry in the 1994 Ice Dragon Pentathalon.

-------------------------------------------------------------

Mint Mead


In searching for a quick mead recipe that did not contain the usual ginger, clove, mace, nutmeg and cinnamon, I found inspiration. I wanted to try something new. It was then that I came into possession of a large amount of fresh mint leaves. Searching through my resources I found the mint was used mead, but I could not find any mention of it being used alone. I could not see why it wouldn't be: there are period non-alcohol drinks made of honey and mint from both Europe and the Middle East. But was there a reason why it wouldn't be used alone in mead? I started with Digby's "Mr. Webbes Meath" recipe to start off with:
Then skim them clean off, and all the froth, or whatever rifeth of the water. Then dissolve in it warm, about one part of honey to six of water: Lave and beat it, till all of the Honey be perfectly dissolved; Then boil it, beginning gentle, till all the scum be risen, and scummed away. It must boil in all about two hours. Half an hour, before you end your boiling, put into it some Rosemary-tops, Thyme, Sweet-marjorame, one Sprig of Minth, in all about half a handful, and as much as all these; in all, about a handful of herbs, and two Ounces of sliced Ginger, and one Ounce of bruised Cinamon. He did use to put in a few Cloves and Mace; But the King did not care for them.
It was nice to see that I was not the only person to tire of cloves and mace in my mead. I did not follow the proportions of the recipe: "one part honey to six of water." While that ratio of honey to water would make mead, it would be drinkable right away. Towards the end of the recipe Digby wrote:
All which will be mellowed ... in the space of a year or two. For this is to be kept so long before it be drunk.
As my plan was for a quick mead, I changed the ratio to 1.4 parts of honey to one part of water. This I did not think too much out of the ordinary, as Digby, writing about the same recipe, said that the brewer himself used an almost one to one ratio of honey to water:
The first of Septemb. 1663. Mr. Webbe came to my House to make some for Me. He took fourty three Gallons of water, and fourty two pounds of Norfolk honey.

Ingredients:

4 Pounds, Clover Honey
3 Pounds, Wildflower Honey
1 Cup, Mint Leaves, chopped fine
5 Gallons, Water
2 Packets, Champagne Yeast

Procedure:

I mixed the honey with one gallon of water and simmered. While the must was simmering, and between skimming the scum off, I steeped the mint leaves in a soup stock ball and made a strong mint tea out of a half gallon of water. When the scum stopped forming on the must, I poured it and the mint tea into the fermenter along with the remaining water. When it cooled I added the yeast.

Primary Fermentation: 1 week
Secondary Fermentation: 1 week
Bottle Aged: 3 1/2 Months

Sources:

Digbie, Sir Kenelme. The Closet of the Eminently Learned Digbie Kt Opened: Whereby is Discovered Several ways for making of Metheglin, Sider, Cherry-Wine, &c. together with Excellent Directions for Cookery: As also for Preserving, Conserving, Candying, &c. First edition, London, 1669. Transcribed by Joyce Miller

-------------------------------------------------------------


Observations from 2015:

I really should brew this mead, again. It was very tasty and got high marks, and nice comments, from the judges. I have discovered since 1994 that the mint works best with a sack or sweet mead. The flavor is nice with a dry mead, but the flavor is kind of ephemeral: on the tongue and forgotten in the next moment. With a sweeter mead, the mint flavor lingers longer. Thinking with 20 years of brewing experience, I wonder if I should make this with a bit of vinegar or wine added to the mead. The acid will crank up the taste buds and allow the drinker to taste more of the flavor of the honey.

See, honey, and the mead that is fermented from it, is pretty much neutral: slightly off from water's pH of 7. This is one of the reasons why mead consumption has dropped since the middle ages. Fermented honey on its own is flat. Wine is acidic and since acids crank up the taste buds, we are able to pick up more of the wine's flavor. The additional flavor, coupled with the aroma, allows the drinker to pick up very subtle tastes. Read the descriptions of wine and you will find descriptions of blackberries, oak, apples, lemons and other things that are not physically present in the wine. Read description of most commercial meads and all you will get is sweet or dry. Most period mead recipes call for other ingredients to offset honey's one dimensional flavor. Read Digby's recipe again: rosemary, thyme, cinnamon, ginger, cloves. These herbs and spices add layers of additional flavors to the mead to offset the blandness of plain honey. 

While there are period recipes for spiced wines, the fast majority of wine produced was made with nothing more than grapes, water and yeast. The high acid content of the wine was enough to heighten the existing flavors so that the drinker could distinguish the subtle flavors of not only the grapes, but the nature of the land that the grapes grew upon. An expert can tell the difference between the grapes from one region and another. Try this experiment: Get a couple of bottles of wine from two different countries, it doesn't matter which ones just as long as they are both white or red wines. Pour a glass from each bottle and set aside. Then pour a second glass from each bottle and mix in some baking soda. Baking soda is a alkaline and will neutralize the acid in the wine. If you get some litmus paper from the Internet, you can balance out the wine's pH. Once you've balanced out the pH, sample each glass and try to tell them apart. Compared to the control samples, the altered wine might as well have been chemically created in a lab. All body and no flavor. Much like plain mead. 

So, herbs, spices, acids such as wine, vinegar or fruit juice and even other sugars such as barley malt can be used to give mead more dimensions in its flavor. 

Saturday, December 12, 2015

Scroll Blank - VOID

Scroll Blank - VOID




Description:


Scroll blank of a VOID device in the middle of an initial ‘D’. Inspired by a late 15th Century, Dutch manuscript.  Gouache and ink on Arches 140 pound, hot-pressed, cotton paper. Produced larger than the original (9x13in vs. 5.4x7.4in)

Details of the original image:

Illuminated Manuscript, Duke Albrecht’s Table of Christian Faith (Winter Part), Confession to a pope, Walters Art Museum Ms. W.171, fol. 116v

Shelf mark: W.171

Manuscript: Duke Albrecht’s Table of Christian faith (winter part)

Text title: Tafel van den Kersten ghelove (winterstuc)

Author: As-written name: Dirc van Delf 

Abstract: This illuminated manuscript is a document of the first importance in the history of Dutch manuscript illumination and contains an important medieval Dutch devotional text. The Tafel van den Kersten ghelove is a compendium of Christian knowledge written by a learned Dominican, Dirc van Delf. The text is in two parts, one for winter, one for summer. This manuscript is of the winter part and is incomplete, omitting the prologue and chapters 13, 14, and 35-57. The arms of the Bavarian counts of Holland and the kneeling owner on fol. 1r indicate that this manuscript was the actual copy prepared for the dedicatee of the text, Albrecht of Bavaria, Count of Holland, from the original text of his chaplain, and is therefore to be dated to 1404 at the latest, when Albrecht died. The manuscript contains 165 folios and thirty-five historiated initials. 

Date: 1400-1404 CE

Origin: Utrecht, Netherlands

Form: Book

Genre: Theological
Language: The primary language in this manuscript is Dutch; Flemish.

Support material: Parchment. Fine to medium-weight parchment, well prepared; visible pricking marks 

Extent: Foliation: i+165+i. Modern pencil foliation in upper right corners of rectos (followed here); fifteenth-century foliation at center of top margins of rectos; gap in latter foliation revealing the loss of seven leaves between present folios 24 and 25, which contained chapters 13 and 14 by Daniels’ numeration (evidently preceding his chapter 12 in this manuscript) 

Dimensions: 13.7 cm wide by 18.8 cm high

Written surface: 8.5 cm wide by 11.5 cm high

LayoutColumns: 1

Ruled lines: 24

Lines ruled in brown ink

Contents: fols. 1r - 165v: 

Title: Tafel van den Kersten ghelove (winterstuc) 

Rubric: Van gode vander godheit en vander triniteyt. Primum capittelum.

Incipit: Die prophete micheas seyt wt den monde godes

Text note: References in this description of the text are to Daniels’ edition of 1939 (see bibliography); text lacks the prologue, as well as chapters 13 and 14, and is incomplete at the end, lacking chapters 35-57; order of chapters 23-24 inverted 

Hand note: Written in Gothic bookhand; instructions to the rubricator in tiny noting hand found in columns in the gutter (e.g. fols. 43r, 52v-53r, and 81r); possible second hand found on the last folio of text (fol. 165r) in a more angular version of the same script 

Decoration note: Miniatures by two painters: artist A (fols. 1r-110r) with soft and painterly style, depending very little on outlines and artist B (fols. 112v-156r) using stronger, brighter colors (artist A also illuminated an initial in the four-volume Bible for the Carthusians of Utrecht [Brussels, Bibl. Roy. Mss. 106, 107, 204, and 205]); historiated initials at the opening of each chapter (four for Daniels’ chapter 1) (10-15 lines); thirty-five further large historiated initials; smaller initials in gold or blue with violet or red marginal penwork; bar borders with trefoil foliage of red, blue, and gold springing from the initials into the entire left margin, the vine turning into the top and bottom margins; chapter captions in red; Latin words in text underlined in red; paragraph marks in red or blue; capital letters within the text picked out with red strokes; instructions for rubrics visible in the gutter of the binding in very small lettering; instructions to the illuminator in Dutch in another hand visible at lower margins on fols. 105r and 110r. [1]


Technique:

This project was an attempt to reproduce this beautiful manuscript, [2] only with the device for the Baronial award for the Venerable Order of the Ice Dragon instead of the confessional scene within the initial. I used gouache and ink on paper thather than vellum and period pigments as I am still a novice and have not mastered the basic materials. Working from a high resolution image of the manuscript, I removed the background colors and printed out the image. The design was transferred to the paper by tracing over a light box.

Instead of making an exact copy of the original image’s, I used them as a guide to help me select new colors that would stand out better and highlight the Barony’s award. I painted the ‘D’ green instead of blue to help the black of the device stand out better. The green, along with the black and the gold, also represent the arms of the Rhydderich Hael. I had thought that using blue, the delineation between the initial and background might be lost. To balance the green of the initial, I used red and blue in the leaves. Both the red and the blue were highlighted with white lines similar to the original image. The dragon was the only item to receive lighting and shading treatments.  I started with a light wash to all areas of the dragon, following up, after allowing enough time for the paint to dry, with darker shades. I applied the paint so that if the virtual light source came from the upper, left-hand corner of the page, the darkest shades would fall into the right most corners, producing shadows.

The background of the ‘D’, leaves and the border were painted with gold gouache and outlined with black ink: no highlighting or shading was used. Several layers of gold paint were used to make the objects stand out. The goal was to produce an image that would stand out and be visible when it was displayed in court.

Once the all of the paint had dried, I outlined all of the sections with black ink to make the image stand out.

[1] http://www.thedigitalwalters.org/Data/WaltersManuscripts/html/W171/description.html
[2] Provided by The Walters Art Museum’s Flikr page.

References:

Flikr Photostream for Caleb Reynolds.  https://www.flickr.com/photos/calebreynolds/22837942620/in/dateposted/

Flickr Photostream for Walters Art Museum Ms. W.171. https://www.flickr.com/photos/medmss/5448308562

Walters Art Museum: Digitized Walters Manuscripts: Walters Ms. W.171, Duke Albrecht’s Table of Christian faith (winter part). http://www.thedigitalwalters.org/Data/WaltersManuscripts/html/W171/description.html

---------------------------------------------------

This scroll blank was made for the A&S competition at Investiture, which I won. Yea!

The nice thing about this manuscript is that I have done scrolls from almost a dozen pages. They are all similar inhabited initials, but the innards can be scooped out and replaced with other images. This one was an award badge. I've done ones with the Royal Arms of Their Highnesses for Prince and Princess's choice at Ice Dragon. I've added people to customize the scroll for a particular person and I've kept the original image. It's all good. The nice thing is this documentation: I've entered a variety of scrolls, from this manuscript, into A&S competitions all using this documentation. I just change the folio number and update my technique to match the image I chose to use. Easy-peazy. 

So, kids, keep your A&S documentation as it can be used over and over again. Thanks to my documentation, I have won two separate A&S: This one at Investiture and one at Lady Mary's a couple of years ago: https://www.flickr.com/photos/calebreynolds/8471091955/in/album-72157647364520813/ 

Friday, December 11, 2015

Things you shouldn't put on an SCA Scroll part 4

Things you shouldn't put on an SCA Scroll part 4



This is from MS. Douce 211. It is Cain killing Able. In and of itself, it isn't a bad image. However, context, man. Context. Imagine this being given out at as a service award, with nothing in the text as to what kind of service merited the award. I'm laughing right now, thinking of actually using this image for a Keystone and using vague, mob-like terms for the service done for the Kingdom. "For taking care of problems and making them disappear."

Thursday, December 3, 2015

A is for Axes

This is a documentation for a scroll that I made for the 2014 Rhydderich Hael A&S Championship. The scroll was also given to the winner of the thrown weapons championship. 

-------------------------------------------------------------

Figure 1

Scroll - A is for Axes

Description:

Scroll of a historiated initial A depicting a centaur spearing a man opening psalm 77. Inspired by folio 101r of the 12th century Hunterian Psalter. [1] Also known as the York Psalter. Gouache and ink on Arches 140 pound, hot-pressed, cotton paper. 

Details of the original image:

Vellum, 11½ x 7½, ff. 202, originally ff. 204, beautifully written in one hand (except the last 33 folios, in XIV. Cent. hand), in single cols. of 21 lines (in Kalendar 35 lines), each 8½ x 4¼, ruled and margined with plummet, 13 full-page pictures, one full-page illumination, gilt, historiated or illuminated initials begin the first verse of each Psalm, small gilt initials (ornamented in Ps. xcvi.) begin the second and following verses, no signatures or catchwords, partial foliation, modern (in pencil), the Kalendar is written in black, red, blue and green, cropped, marginalia (first three folios only), fol. sec. Martis. Cents. XII. (and XIV.)
Binding: Millboards, covered crimson morocco, richly gilt-tooled inside margins, edges and sides (lines), panelled back, title (gilt): PSALTERIUM | UETUS | IN MEMBRANIS. Late Cent. XVII.
[For detailed collation see: John Young and P. Henderson Aitken, A Catalogue of the Manuscripts in the Library of The Hunterian Museum in The University of Glasgow. (Glasgow, 1908), p. 170.]

Although much of the early life of the Psalter remains a mystery, its acquisition by Glasgow University is quite clear. It came as part of William Hunter’s magnificent library in 1807, along with the rest of his wonderful collections. Dr William Hunter (1718-83) was a famous anatomist and physician, and renowned collector of books, manuscripts, coins, medals, paintings, shells, minerals, and anatomical and natural history specimens. Under the terms of his will, his library and other collections remained in London for several years after his death - for the use of his nephew, Dr Matthew Baillie (1761-1823) - and arrived at the University in 1807.

Hunter’s collection of books contains some 10,000 printed books and 650 manuscripts; it forms one of the finest Eighteenth Century libraries to survive intact.  Hunter acquired this volume at the sale of the library of Louis-Jean Gaignat in Paris on 10 April 1769, along with several other books. His French agent, Jean B. Dessain, bought it at the auction on Hunter’s behalf for fifty livres and one sou; it was described in the sale catalogue as a ‘codex pervetustus’ (‘an antiquated book’). Now regarded as the greatest treasure in his library, Hunter was paying three times as much for early printed books at the time. [2]

Technique:

This was the first scroll in my alphabet challenge: twenty-six scrolls featuring inhabited initials; in alphabetical order. It was fitting to start the challenge off with something for the Rhydderich Hael. Thus, this scroll: A is for Axes.

This project was an attempt to reproduce this beautiful manuscript, only with the colors of the Barony of the Rhydderich Hael instead those on the original image. I used gouache and ink on paper rather than vellum and period pigments as I am still a novice and have not mastered the basic materials. Working from a high resolution image of the manuscript, [3] I removed the background colors and printed out the image. The design was transferred to the paper by tracing over a light box. {figure 2} This scroll was made for the 2014 Baronial Champion for thrown weapons. The image was picked as it contained both an axe and a spear. And I really liked the image.

Figure 2

Instead of making an exact copy of the original image, I used it as a guide to help me select new colors that would stand out better and highlight the Barony’s, and Kingdom’s, colors. The human figure is wearing green and black while the centaur is wearing red and white and wielding a shield of green and black. No symbolism was intended, the red and white provided a contrast to the green and black.

Figure 3

The scroll is Arches 100% cotton, 140# hot-press watercolor paper. This scroll is 9x12". I used gouache: Reeves for colors and Holbein for the gold. {figure 3} I went heavy on the gold to give it some texture. For the figures and background, I used a very watered down base coat all over, with three layers over each area; each layer thicker and thus, darker, than the previous one. Once the paint was dry, I added the white work. I have found that with the Reeves gouache, the added white really makes the paint pop, especially the dark paints. I applied the paint so that if the virtual light source came from the upper, left-hand corner of the page, the darkest shades would fall into the right most corners, producing shadows. {figure 4}

Figure 4

The background of the ‘A’, leaves and the border were painted with ultramarine blue gouache and highlighted with white dots: no highlighting or shading was used. Several layers of gold paint were used to make the objects stand out. The goal was to produce an image that would stand out and be visible when it was displayed in court.

Once the all of the paint had dried, I outlined all of the sections with black ink to make the image stand out, then added white ink to the highlights, to give the figures a sense of depth. {figure 5}

Figure 5


The calligraphy is also by my hand, poor as it is. Instead of trying to use the same hand as the original scribe, I used a secretary hand: essentially a neat [4] print using a calligraphy nib. The words were also by myself, picked for the occasion and not inspired by any period source.

Figure 6


[1] Glasgow, University Library, MS. Hunter 229
[2] From the University of Glasgow’s web site: http://special.lib.gla.ac.uk/manuscripts/search/detail_c.cfm?ID=34725
[3] Provided by the Glasgow University Library Special Collections Department’s web site: Book of the Month, May 2007, http://special.lib.gla.ac.uk/exhibns/month/may2007.html
[4] Neat for me.


References:

Caballero, Rosario; Díaz Vera, Javier E. Textual Healing: Studies in Medieval English Medical, Scientific and Technical Texts. Peter Lang, 2010

Gibson, Margaret T.; Heslop, T. A.; Pfaff, Richard William. The Eadwine Psalter: Text, Image, and Monastic Culture in Twelfth-century Canterbury. Penn State Press, Jan 1, 1992

Glasgow University Library Special Collections Department’s web site: Book of the Month, May 2007, http://special.lib.gla.ac.uk/exhibns/month/may2007.html



-------------------------------------------------------------


Observations from 2015:

I enjoyed making this scroll and it went to a good friend. High resolution images of my work can be found at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/calebreynolds/13936238212/in/album-72157644141662762/ and https://www.flickr.com/photos/calebreynolds/14086773236/in/album-72157644141662762/.  

Saturday, November 28, 2015

The earliest depiction of the fashion police

Strips and plaid? To the gallows with him!



This is from the 12th century Life of St. Edmund (1130). Here we see St. Edmund being led away, hands bound, wearing a very elaborate striped tunic and what looks like plaid chausses. Clearly, he has violated the bounds of good taste.

Friday, November 27, 2015

John Barleycorn

This is a poem and documentation that I wrote for the 2004 Ice Dragon Pentathalon. 

-------------------------------------------------------------


John Barleycorn


Once he was young and clad in green
Fine his hair about his head,
Both men and women did him ill
When he grew upon the hill.

Along came Sir William Whiskey
And he alone did divine
To bury him quick within the earth,
And swore he should not rise.

He saw his head began to rear
And sent for Richard Beere
Who brought with him fifty and eight
Men of war with their weapons so great

They rushed forward with sickles keen
And every one of them took a swing.
They cut him shortly below the knee
And gave him bloody wounds until he fell.

So then they took him up again,
And bound him shortly about the waist
And packed him up in several stacks,
To wither with the wind.

They brought him from the hill
Not one friend had he in this band
With rough hands they made him to stand
For they would let him lie no more.

Then Thomas Goodale a sickle he picked up
And with one swing cut through his top
And John Barleycorn without his head
Could no more hear, see nor speak.

There he lay groning by the walls
Until all his wounds were sore;
At length they took him up again,
And cast him on the floor.

Then two men with stout clubs,
Stepped foward to beat his body.
They hit poor John Barleycorn
Until his flesh fell from the bone.

Then they picked him up again,
And took his flesh away.
They cast his bones upon the floor,
Swearing John Barleycorn would die.

Then they picked him up again
And threw him in a kiln,
And his bones there was dried by fire
But still Barleycorn would not die.

To the miller he was brought
For Barleycorn's death they sought
And the miller there burst his bones
Between a pair of great mill stones.

Then before any man may quarrell
They drowned him in a barrel
And was left there all alone
Until the seasons had changed again.

But until they set a tap to him
He was still alive in that tun
And they drew out his blood
Until nary a drop would run.

But it was John Barleycorn
Who had the last laugh.
For upon ther faces he sets his mark,
Two blood red eyes and a nose to match

And John Barleycorn paid them all
For some he took their tongues away
Or their legs or else their sight.
And left the rest sleeping where they lay.



This poem was done in the style of several of the 17th century written version of the song by the same name. One of the earliest written documentation appeared during the reign of King James I, but was a common song at that time. The song so well known throughout England in the 17th century that many regional variants were recorded; Separate versions from Sussex, Hampshire, surrey, Somerset and Wiltshire were published.

In The Penguin Book of English Folk Songs (by Dr Ralph Vaugham Williams and A.L. Lloyd) the following note about this ballad can be read:
"This ballad is rather a mystery. Is it an unusually coherent folklore survival of the ancient myth of the slain and the resurrected Corn-God, or is it the creation of an antiquarian revivalist, which has passed into popular currency and become `folklorised'? It is in any case an old song, of which an elaborate form was printed in the reign of James I. It was widespread over the English and Scottish countryside, and Robert Burns rewrote a well-known version."

John Barleycorn is an anthropomorphized image of the barley grain that goes into making malt beverages, whom I named in the piece, Sir William Whiskey, Richard Beere and Thomas Goodale. I wrote the poem using the style of alliteration found in past versions. I tried to bring about the same imagery without repeating what far better poets have done before me. I also tried to avoid just rewriting the entire song. In the Robert Burns' version, he gives:
They wasted, o'er a scorching flame,
The marrow of his bones;
But a miller us'd him worst of all,
For he crush'd him between two stones.

In keeping with this tradition, I wrote in a less poetic style:
Then they picked him up again
And threw him in a kiln,
And his bones there was dried by fire
But still Barleycorn would not die. 

To the miller he was brought
For Barleycorn's death they sought
And the miller there burst his bones
Between a pair of great mill stones.

In an even earlier version (Allan-a-mault)
Quhy sowld not allane honorit be
Quhen he wes yung and cled in grene
Haifand his air abowt his Ene
Baith men an wemem did him mene
quhen he grew on yon hilis he
quhy sowld not allane honorit be 

His fostir faider of the toun
To vissy Allane he maid him boun
he saw him lyane allace in swoun
For falt of help and lyk to de
quhy sowld not allane honorit be

And my version:
Once he was young and clad in green
Fine his hair about his head,
Both men and women did him ill
When he grew upon the hill.

Along came Sir William Whiskey
And he alone did divine
To bury him quick within the earth,
And swore he should not rise.



References:
Thomas Robbin's Chapbook: The Arraignment and Inditing of Sir John Barleycorn, Knight. Oxford Press

Burns, Robert. Poems. 1787.

Clauge, Dr. John,  Manx Reminiscences; English Transaltion. 1911

Barley: The World's Oldest Crop. From the University of Oregon's Barley Project

The Penguin Book of English Folk Songs. Edited by Ralph Vaughan Williams and A.L. Lloyd. Penguin Books, Baltimore, MD 1968. Originally published 1959

 Bruce Olsen's Roots of Folk: Old English, Scots, and Irish Songs and Tunes (http://users.erols.com/olsonw/)


-------------------------------------------------------------


Observations from 2015:


I had forgotten that I had wrote this. I had found it in a zipped up archive. Not my finest piece of work, or my best documentation. 

Monday, November 23, 2015

Polka dot stags

I think AEthelmearc needs a new award: a Polka Dot Alce. To go along with the Golden Alce and the Silver Alce. And I have period documentation for it:


Perhaps for silly and strange martial skills. Or period rap battles. The image is from Luttrell Psalter, England ca. 1325-1340. British Library, Add 42130, fol. 296r.

Thursday, November 19, 2015

Things you shouldn't put on an SCA Scroll part 3

Things you shouldn't put on an SCA Scroll part 3




This is from The Rochester BestiaryBritish Library, Royal 12 F XIII, fol. 39v. It looks like a lovely image but it is one ass licking another ass's ass. That's right: medieval ass licking. Just don't do it. Perhaps if you replace the one ass with a cake....?

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

Monday, November 16, 2015

How to get a Golden Alce

Where Golden Alces come from.



When a yellow doe and a red buck love each other very much, they give each other a special hug and, a few months later, a golden alce is born. 

Thursday, November 5, 2015

The Pretzel

This is documentation that I wrote for the 2007 Ice Dragon Pentathalon.

-------------------------------------------------------------

Figure 1

The Pretzel


A pretzel is a baked snack that is ordinarily twisted into a unique knot-like shape. The pretzel is usually made from wheat flour with yeast; the dough is briefly dipped in lye water before baking, and usually salted. In Bavaria it is obligatory in a Weißwurst breakfast.
- From Wikipedia [1]

The history of the pretzel is shrouded is mystery and rumor. It is, perhaps, the oldest, continuously eaten snack food ever developed. It was adopted by almost every country it was introduced in and spread through Europe faster than the Black Plague. Almost every country, in Medieval times, adopted an "origin" story that placed the birthplace of the pretzel in their most beloved city. (Sigmaringen, Vienna, Rome, Paris and London have all claimed to be the birth place of the pretzel). [2] Separating fact from fiction seams to be as twisted a job as the pretzel itself. It’s ingredients, it’s shape, it’s origins, even it’s name is shrouded in mystery, rumor and fiction.

The most common origin of the pretzel is set in a monastery in the 4th, 5th, 6th or 7th century depending on the source (Bunch and Hellemans place the date at 210AD). The monastery is claimed to have resided in either Northern Italy, Southern France, Alsace, Southwest Germany or somewhere in Austria. [3] Time and place aside, one of the most often quoted origin of goes as follows: A monk was preparing a traditional Lenten bread when it occurred to him to arrange long skinny pieces of dough into the shape of arms folded at prayer, so as to remind his brothers to pray. An explanation of why monks living in a monastery needed to be reminded to pray in the first place is curiously absent. And anyway, since when do monks "fold their arms" to pray? Medieval illustrations uniformly portray monks praying in the same, physical way it is today: kneeling, head bowed, palms either pressed together or open to the sky.

Figure 2


A variation of the story, almost as well quoted, has this unknown monk using scraps of bread to make treats to bribe or reward children who had memorized their Bible verses and prayers. "The monk called it a pretiola, Latin for ‘little reward’" [4]. I find this explanation just as unlikely as the previous one. One, when baking bread, there are no scraps; all of the dough is used. Two, children were more likely punished for not learning their lessons than rewarded for doing what they were ordered to do. Using vague entomology, food historians have "documented" the travels of the pretiola over the Alps, through Austria, and into Germany, where it became known as the Bretzel. Once it reached England, the "B" had changed to a "P" and the English gained the Pretzel. Other sources derive the name from Latin bracellus (a medieval term for "bracelet"). [5] Some sources say that the shape of the Pretzel is of a "B" because in Germany, where they were invented, they were called Bretzels. [6]

The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, gives the Etymology as:

The German word Brezel or Pretzel, which was borrowed into English (being first recorded in English in 1856) goes back to the assumed Medieval Latin word *brachitellum. This would accord with the story that a monk living in France or northern Italy first created the knotted shape of a pretzel, even though this type of biscuit had been enjoyed by the Romans. The monk wanted to symbolize arms folded in prayer, hence the name derived from Latin bracchiatus, "having branches," itself from bracchium, "branch, arm."

There is another legend that tells us of a baker, from whichever is your favorite city, [7] accused of larceny was offered the opportunity to cancel his sentence if he could make a piece of bread through which the sun could be seen thrice; the ingenious baker, inspired by the way his worried wife held her arms, twisted his dough into a pretzel before baking. Personally, I cannot see any intelligent person telling a baker that he will be acquitted of a crime if he bakes something with three holes in it. And this does little to explain the shape of the pretzel; why not instead take an ordinary lump of bread dough, poke three holes in it and call it a day. Another variation on this myth is that the baker committed his crime during Easter and was commanded to produce something that represented the Trinity. [8] In that case, why didn’t the baker bake something in the form of a cross, or three pieces of bread. Or even two pieces of bread and claim that the missing third piece represents the Holy Spirit, which cannot be seen.


Figure 3

Another myth is that the pretzel was not invented in Europe, but in the Americas. The story goes, that to keep animals from eating surplus wheat, Native Americans would bake the surplus grain into rings and then hang them on tree branches high above the ground. Unfortunately, wheat was not introduced to mainland North and South America until the late 15th Century. [9] The main grain of the Americas prior to this time was Maze. Since Maze contains no gluten, the protein structure that makes bread chewy, flour made from maze is not have the stronger structure to be made into bread that can support it’s own weight when hung from a tree (compare the durability between a "corn" and "flour" soft taco shells). Aside from this, we know the pretzel were made (and eaten) in Europe prior to 1492 and this myth does nothing to explain why the bread was twisted into a knot. Would it not be easier to make a plain ring. Besides, birds love bread and they live in trees.

Figure 4


A French web site gives the following explanation of the shape:

Son origine semble déjà remonter a l’époque celtique, ou l’on représentait les planètes et les saisons sous forme de pâtisseries. Ainsi le pain en forme d’anneau, dit Jula, (début février), se gardait jusqu’aux moissons; on le réduisait en chapelure pour la mélanger à la semence nouvelle. En Alsace, l’anneau était garni de quatre rayons en pâte, que l’on réduisit plus tard. Charles Gérard dans L’Ancienne Alsace a Table semble croire que les Romains l’aient introduit chez nous sous le nom de "panis tordus ". [10]

Its origin already seems to go up has the Celtic time, or one represented planets and the seasons in the form of pastry makings. Thus the bread in the shape of ring, known as Jula, (at the beginning of February), was kept until the harvests; one reduced it in chapelure to mix it with the new seed. In Alsace, the ring was furnished with four rays in paste, which one reduced later. Charles Gerard in Old Alsace has Table seems to believe that the Romans introduced it on our premises under the name of "twisted panic grasses". [11]
Figure 5


The web site www.bretzelforbush.com states that the "Pretzel is the same shape than the traditional Alsacian hat from Kocherberg." [12] This is an interesting ideal, but I was unable to find any pictures of this particular hat, nor was I able to find any other resource that made a similar claim. The same web site also gives the following tid-bit:

Another legend tells that St Florentin tried to draw a cross inside a circle and did it badly. The cross with the ring was supposed to symbolise a christian symbol (the cross) and a pagan symbol (the sun).

This is another claim that I could not find independent collaboration of. I included it because this quote, word for word, is repeated on several dozen English language web sites, linking back to www.bretzelforbush.com. I also found over 50 web sites in French, German, Dutch and Italian with the same quote, and link, only in the local language. This is a perfect example of how misinformation becomes the "Truth." Saint Florentin did live in the 5th century AD [13] which put him in the right time period for the birth of the pretzel. However, no correlation between pretzels and the saint can be found in my research. Nor do the town, village, city and canton named after the saint mention anything about pretzels, either. One would think that the saint who created such a wonderful snack item would be the patron saint of it; but the pretzel is most associated with Saint Joseph. [14]

One of my favorite myths about the shape of the pretzel combines the three "L’s;" larceny, law enforcement and laziness. Apparently, crime was quite high around insert-your-favorite-city-here. So high that the local law enforcement was always in armor and in the saddle. When word came that some merchant was being robbed, they would sally forth. Since they are always so busy, the local sheriff asked the bakers to bake a round bread so that the soldiers could slide it on their spears so that they could eat without letting go of the horse’s reigns or the spears. The bakers, the story goes, baked the bread in a pretzel shape so that the soldiers could eat the pretzel’s outer rings without banging their noses or lips on the bread closest to the spear. This myth is so unlikely and improbable that I will not waste the reader’s time by debunking it. I will only say; how incompetent a calvary soldier do you have to be to not to be able to eat on the move? This story is very reminiscent of the legend of the donut, which was apparently stuck on one of the spokes of a sailing ship’s wheel so that the pilot could eat it while using both hands to steer. [15]

Figure 6


What about hard vs. soft pretzels? Which one came first; that should be simple to figure out. Legend says fate was kind to a young baker who fell asleep and left his turn of soft pretzels in the oven too long. When the fire died down, the pretzels toasted and GBD. [16] Fortunately, the employer liked the nutty flavor of the hard pretzel and didn’t fire the young baker. [17] This would suggest that the hard pretzel followed the soft pretzel. Unfortunately, this is another twisty region of doubt. Ilaria Gozzini Giacosa dates the pretzel back to ancient Rome to the Picenum, a twice baked flat bread, similar to hard tack, that contained no eggs, sugar or milk that could spoil on long marches. [18] In The Larder Invaded, the authors date the soft pretzel to 19th century Philadelphia as nothing more than "a fresh version of the hard pretzel." On the other hand, Diane Spangen wrote, "the hard pretzel came into existence by accident in the late 17th century in Pennsylvania."

Sturgis Pretzels’s web site says that the first recipe for hard pretzels was given to the company’s founder, Julius Sturgis, by a drifter. [20] William Harlan Hale equates the soft pretzel to a twisted variation of the bagel, [21] which was first documented in 1610. In The Joys of Yiddish, Leo Rosten notes that "The first printed mention of bagels...is to be found in the Community Regulations of Kracow, Poland, for the year 1610 - which stated that bagels would be given as a gift to any woman in childbirth." He adds that the word is derived from the German word beugel, meaning a round loaf of bread. There are those who dispute this and claim that it derives from the middle High German word bugel,’ which means a twisted or curved bracelet or ring..." [22] On the other hand, Wikipedea, the Word Net Dictionary and the Encyclopedia of American Food and Drink all say that the bagel descended from the pretzel.

Figure 7


Surely we can track the pretzel down by what it is made of. The one thing that is known definitively is that at some point the pretzel came to be associated with Lent, the Catholic pre-Easter fasting period. It’s not hard to see why, since it’s a perfect Lenten food: Plain; No meat; No dairy; No sugar; No eggs [23] or any of the other foodstuffs that Catholics have averred at various points through history. As to when that happened, there are only guesses. Paintings by the Dutch Masters depicting early Christianity featured pretzels, but then that just seems to be where they thought pretzels came from. If they had any evidence linking the two, it’s since been lost to us. So, we have a bread like food that’s made only with flour, water, yeast, salt. Surely that can be simple to document. The Catholic Cookbook was kind enough to provide the following information about traditional Lenten pretzels:

The one traditional Lenten food is the pretzel. In the early Church the rules of fasting did not allow meat, dairy products or eggs. These small breads made from flour, water and salt were made to accompany the simple meals of fish, fruits and vegetables. The breads were shaped in the forms of arms crossed in prayer to keep a reminder that Lent was a time of prayer and penance. The Latin term for these was bracellae, or "little arms" (bracellae). The word "pretzel" comes from the German word brezel or prezel. 

1 Tablespoon honey or sugar 
1 1/2 cups lukewarm water (100 - 110 F) 
1 envelope active dry yeast 
1 teaspoon salt 
4 cups flour 
Coarse or kosher salt 
1 egg, beaten 


DIRECTIONS
Let the warm water, yeast and sugar stand for hour. Mix with the flour into the water mixture. Add the honey to the water; sprinkle in the yeast and stir until dissolved. Add teaspoon salt. Blend in the flour, and knead the dough until smooth. Cut the dough into pieces. Roll them into ropes and twist into pretzel shapes. You can make small pretzels with thin ropes, or large ones with fat ropes, but remember that to cook at the same rate, your pretzels need to be all the same size. Place the pretzels on lightly greased cookie sheets. Brush them with beaten egg. Sprinkle with coarse salt. Bake at 42 5º F. for 12 to 15 minutes, until the pretzels are golden brown. 

CatholicCulture.org, Trinity Communications online source for Catholic information, provides very similar information, as well as a recipe with no sugar but butter instead:

Surprising as it sounds, the pretzel has great historical and spiritual significance for Lent. In fact, it used to be the Lenten bread in the early centuries of the Christian era. The faithful in the old Roman Empire kept a very strict fast all through Lent - no milk, no butter, no cheese, no eggs, no cream and, of course, no meat. Instead, they made small breads of water, flour and salt, to accompany their meagre fare of vegetables, fruit, and fish. To remind themselves that Lent was a time of prayer, they shaped these breads in the forms of arms crossed in prayer, and called them "little arms" (bracellae). This Latin word eventually became the Germanic "pretzel." 
Thus, the pretzel is the most appropriate food symbol for the season of Lent. It still shows the form of arms crossed in prayer over the chest, reminding us that Lent is a time of prayer. It consists of flour and water only, thus proclaiming Lent as a period of fasting. That pretzels are eaten today all through the year is only accidental. In many sections of Europe they are still served only from Ash Wednesday to Easter, thereby keeping the ancient symbolism alive. 
Catholic families could well return to this religious use of the pretzel in the home. The children will be delighted when they hear the true story of this symbol of Lent; and a small pretzel at every dinner plate during Lent will certainly proclaim its spiritual message as clearly and deeply to our modern families as it did to our fellow Christians in ancient Rome - that Lent is a sacred season of prayer and fasting. 

2 cups sifted all-purpose flour 
4 egg yolks 
1 tablespoon melted butter 
1/16 teaspoon salt 
cold milk 
caraway seed 
coarse salt 


DIRECTIONS: Mix together flour, egg yolks, melted butter and salt in a mixing bowl. Slowly add milk until dough is smooth. Place dough on floured board. Beat dough with end of rolling pin for about 15 minutes. Roll small pieces of dough into pencil-like strips. Form into pretzel shape. Drop into boiling water and boil for approximately 5 minutes. Remove pretzel from boiling water; place in refrigerator overnight. Place pretzels on baking dish. Brush with egg white; sprinkle with caraway seed and coarse salt. Bake at 400° until crisp and brown. 

Figure 8


The New York Carver’s web site also offers conflicting information about the pretzel: [24]

Since pretzels didn’t contain any ingredients that weren’t eaten during the pre-Easter season - eggs, milk, butter, lard - the pretzel became a popular Lenten food throughout the Middle Ages. .... The sugar or chocolate-coated varieties popular with tourists hark back to a 16th century recipe, translated below:
Take white flour, only the white of eggs and some wine, sugar and anise, prepare a dough with these ingredients, roll the dough with clean hands such that it becomes longish and round. Make small pretzels from it and put them into a warm oven and bake them so that you do not burn it but that they are well dried. This way, they will become crisp and good. If you like, you may take cinnamon as an ingredient for the dough, too (but you can leave it). This dish is called Precedella.

The web site did not provide any reference to the source of this recipe. Other recipes I discovered share the same contradiction between description and ingredient list. All mention that pretzels were prized because they didn’t contain certain ingredients but follow up with a recipe that includes the very items that are forbidden.

At least we can all agree that pretzels are coated with salt. Many experts say that the salt helped to preserve the pretzel and made the eater more thirsty and more inclined to buy another beer.

...pretzels keep extremely well, and their saltiness has made them a favorite accompaniment to alcoholic drinks throughout northern Europe. [25]

Except that I can find no reference to other salty food being served in taverns to encourage their patrons to drink more for beer or wine. Besides, I have found many references to pretzels being sold outdoors by people who sold them to the general public; not in taverns and inns which sold alcoholic beverages. On top of that, none of the period illustrations that I have found show anything on the pretzels that can be associated with salt. [26] Also, in the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries, in France, a pretzel loving country, [27] there was a large tax on salt. So large that many bakers were only using the bare minimum for their goods. "At the time of the Revolution, when the price of salt dropped from 4 sous to 1 sou, bakers were able to indulge their liking for both salt and liberty." [28] If pretzels were salted, then they would have been a luxury item in France at this time period.

What about the "glaze." Modern pretzels are dipped into a lye solution; were they in period times? Roland Murten’s web site gives the following story:

Even the coating of lye on the Pretzel arose quite by chance: the baker’s cat, sleeping in front of the warm oven, jumped up and knocked the pretzels into a pan of hot lye solution which had actually been prepared to season other dishes. There was no more time to prepare a new batch of dough, so the batch covered with lye had to be baked. At first only the baker was amazed by the result, but later.... Or, there is the story told by a royal messenger. While breakfasting in a coffee house, he noticed that the Pretzels there tasted quite different to the usual sugary "Lenten Pretzels". On this particular day the baker had accidentally glazed his pretzels with a sodium lye used to clean the pans instead of with sugar water. And, thanks to this mistake, the salty lye pretzel was born...
Harry N Abrams’s History of Bread only mentions pretzels six times: three times in the descriptions of illustrations and three on the same page when describing Lenten bread. Abrams wrote that, in Germany and France, the pretzel was eaten plain during lent but throughout the rest of the year, the pretzels were cut open when hot and slathered with butter. In Six Thousand Years of Bread, the author mentions that pretzels were enjoyed throughout the year but were especially sought after during lent. [29] Jacobs also repeats several of the myths that I have detailed earlier.

I was surprised that Sir Digby did not mention anything like pretzels in his great book. I was similarly surprised to find out that Take 1000 Eggs also listed nothing. Perhaps Madamme Toussaint-Samat could shed some light on the pretzel. I reached for my copy of The History of Food. I read the entire section on bread three times. I searched the index over and over. I checked the chapter on lent. Then I checked again. Nothing. Not an electronic sausage. Not a single reference to pretzels. How can the most popular snack food in the world, with so many stories and legends relating to it, not show up in The History of Food? It was at this point that I gave up trying to document the pretzel and started to write up my notes.

So, after five months of researching the topic, I can faithfully report on the following details of the pretzel in medieval times. I think that I can speak without fear of contradiction when I say: No one knows who invented the pretzel; No one knows where or when it was invented; No one knows why they are the shape they are in; No one knows if they were soft or crunchy; No one knows why they are called pretzels and no one can agree what they are made out of, but they were eaten during Lent. And at every other time of the year as well.

So, is there anything that we do know? Well, we do know that pretzels were popular and we know what shape they were in. They appeared in the art work and doodles of the time period. They appeared in church documents and the name appeared in non-cooking references as descriptors.

Figure 9


The Hours of Catherine of Cleves (1440) has a plate of St. Bartholomev’s death with little people, angels, devils or children holding pretzels in the marginallia. (Figure 9) Woodcuts of street merchants often showed pretzels. Johannes Kepler’s 1609 work, Astronomia Nova, [p. 3] mentions pretzels, not by name but by description, in describing the perceived retrograde motion of Mars, Venus and Jupiter.

HÆC omnia si quis fasciculo uno componat, simulque credat, solem revera moveri annuo spacio per zodiacum, quod credidere Ptolemæus & Tycho Braheus; tunc necesse est concedere, trium superiorum Planetarum circuitus per spacium ætherium, sicuti sunt compositi ex pluribus motibus, esse revera spirales; non ut prius, fili glomerati modo, spiris juxta invicem ordinatis; sed verius in figura panis quadragesimalis, in hunc fere modum.
"If one puts all of this information together in one bundle, and at the same time believes that the sun truly moves across the Zodiac over the space of a year, as Ptolemy and Tycho Brahe believed, then it is necessary to concede that the circuits of the three above planets through etherial space are, as it were, a complex of several movements, that they are actually twisted; not like a knotted wire, with  twists in a sequential order, but rather in the image of a lenten bread, as the following diagram shows..." [30]
Figure 10


I decided to base my recipe on the assumption that there was only one recipe for making pretzels. The method for making them for lent would also prove to be very profitable the rest of the year round. My pretzels would use nothing more than flour, water, yeast and salt. Christina Krupp posted similar thoughts on Stefan’s Florilegium:

I don’t have any information on what Breughel’s pretzels are actually made from, but as a Lenten food, it would not surprise me to find it was simple flour, water, yeast, and perhaps a touch of salt.... I presume you know that flour can vary greatly in protein and gluten content, from very soft to quite hard. For pretzels and bagels and such you want the hardest flour you can get. In period that would have been durum (in Italy and southern France) or northern, Russian, or Middle Eastern wheat (in northern Europe). The English liked their native soft flour, but then they didn’t go in much for pretzels. Nowadays, I’d use a bread flour (such as King Arthur unbleached) if making it by hand. If you have a mixer with a dough hook you can use the King Arthur Special for Bread Machines, which is very high gluten. I suspect our modern American/Canadian hard wheats (bred from the hardest Russian/Armenian strains) are even harder than the strongest period flours. But in any case, avoid "general purpose" flours such as General Mills, Pillsbury, etc for this purpose. What King Arthur calls "General Purpose" flour is already harder than the mainstream brands. This is particularly true in the Southern states, which have a preference for softer flour, so the General Mills, Pillsbury, etc meant to be sold there are formulated differently than the same brands sold in New England.

So, bread flour it is. For yeast, I will use beer yeast instead of modern bread (instant) yeast, more fitting in what was available to bakers in period times. I used kosher salt because it contains neither anti-clumping agents nor iodine. I found the following recipe from The World Wide Gourmet:

The traditional method for making pretzels involves several steps: first, water, flour, salt, yeast and malt extract are carefully kneaded, either manually or mechanically, to form a sticky dough. After considerable manipulation, the dough is cut into lengths about 1 5 cm (6") long that the baker rolls under his hands, one at a time, to create slender dough "sausages." Each one is then knotted into a pretzel shape, with the tapered ends folded back over the pretzel’s thicker central part (this makes an important difference to the final taste). Then the pretzels are placed, four at a time, on racks and left to rise for 2 hours, after which they are placed by twos or fours into a boiling water bath containing baking soda or a salt brine and left until they float to the surface. As they come up, the baker places them on a wooden peel, sprinkles them with coarse salt and puts them into the oven until they are golden brown; they can be eaten an hour after they are baked. In fact, pretzels must be eaten fresh on the day they are made and so are delivered immediately. One day later they begin to dry out and harden.

Ingredients
300g (3 cups) flour
200 ml (generous 3/4 cup) warm water
2 egg whites
65g (2oz.) baking soda
15g (1/2oz.) dry yeast
Coarse salt or sea salt
Cumin (Mattekümmel) Boiling water


Make a firm dough with the flour, warm water and yeast; let rise in a draft-free place, covered with a cloth, until the dough has doubled in volume; cut the dough into strips and form into knot shapes; drop the pretzels, two at a time, into boiling water to which you have added the baking soda. When they float to the surface, drain them and place on an oiled baking sheet. Brush with egg white and sprinkle with coarse salt and cumin. Bake in the oven until nicely browned and dried. Enjoy the fresh pretzels with a mug of beer.

By modifying this recipe, I was able to come up with something that would be "kosher" for lent and in keeping with what a period baker would have been able to make and make a living off of:

3 cups of Bread flour (King Arthur band Artisan, Organic flour from hard red wheat, unbleached)
3/4 cup warm water
1/2 oz. ale yeast (Mutton’s Ale yeast)
Kosher salt
Boiling water

This is in keeping with period bread making techniques:

THE MAKING OF FINE MANCHET
Take half a bushell of fine flower twise boulted, and a gallon of faire luke warm water, almost a handful of white salt, and almost a pinte of yest, then temper all these together, without any more liquor, as hard as ye can handle it: then let it lie halfe an hower, then take it up, and make your Manchetts, and let them stand almost an hower in the oven. Memorandum, that of every bushell of meale may be made five and twentie caste of bread, and every loaf to way a pounde besyde the chesill. [31]

While the yeast bloomed in warm water, I mixed together the flour and water with a pinch of salt. Once I was certain that the yeast was alive, I mixed it in with the flour and kneaded it together. I covered the dough with a cloth and let it "rise until it has doubled in volume." I rolled the dough out by hand and shaped them into pretzels. I made small pretzels to better fit with my working area and oven. I also discovered that I would have made a lousy baker and claim that my lumpy, misshapen pretzels are "period" because there are no period recipes for them and none of the period illustrations are clear enough to prove me wrong. I am certain that there is a technique for twisting the pretzel shape, but I was not able to master it. I boiled half of the pretzels (because I couldn’t find any evidence for or against the practice) and covered half of each batch with a light layer of salt. I discovered that the salt stuck to the boiled pretzels better than the un-boiled ones. I baked them for 20 minutes in a 425 degree oven. When done, it appeared that the boiled pretzels came out soft and the non-boiled ones were harder and crunchier. Both batches of pretzels came out of the oven a golden blond instead of the dark brown of modern pretzels. This probably due to the lack of browning agents, such as sugar, eggs or lye. I am not too concerned that my pretzels do not look like their modern cousins: none of the color illustrations that I found show the pretzels as the mahogany brown of modern pretzels; just tan or light brown. Just as a personal note: the salted pretzels taste better than the non-salted ones.



[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breze
[2] Various
[3] Various
[4] OED
[5] E.g. OED s.v.: "[G. pretzel, bretzel, in OHG. brizzilla = It. bracciello (Florio) a cracknel; usually taken as ad. med.L. bracellus a bracelet; also a kind of cake or biscuit (Du Cange).]"
[6] Dear Yahoo
[7] http://www.joepastry.com/index.php?s=pretzel lists variations naming cities in Italy, Germany, France even colonial America
[8] http://www.answers.com/topic/pretzel and Wiliopdia
[9] Columbus wrote to Ferdinand and Isabella requesting that more wheat and livestock would be needed for the next voyage to the colony on Hispanola.
[10] http://www.epicerieduval.fr/Cat/P5YX1 .htm
[11] Translation by Alta Vista’s Bable Fish
[12] Bretzel for Bush
[13] Was martyrized in 406
[14] Women for Faith & Family
[15] Various
[16] Golden, Brown and Delicious
[17] Sturgis, Answers and Bunch & Hellemans
[18] p. 58
[19] p. 52
[20] Sturgis
[21] p. 644
[22] Claiborne, p23
[23] Various
[24] http://www.newyorkcarver.com/inventions5A.htm
[25] Olver
[26] Such as dots or specs
[27] Mariani, p.255
[28] Toussaint-Samat, p.238
[29] p.115
[30] Translation by Wikipedea
[31] David, E. From The Good Huswife’s Haindmaide for the Kitchen, 1594

Bibliography


Abrams, Harry N. History of Bread. Barnes & Noble: New York 1999

The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company:
New York. 2000.

Anomyous. Pretzels for God: Lent and the Pretzel. CatholicCulture.org. Reprinted from a flyer printed by St. Francis Xavier Church. [http://catholicculture.org/lit/activities/view.cfm?id=543]

Answers.com. Pretzels. [http://www.answers.com/topic/pretzel/Pretzel]

Auntie Anne’s. The History of the Pretzel [http://www.auntieannes.com/pretzel_history.aspx]. 2006.

Ayto, John. An A to Z of Food and Drink. Oxford University Press: Oxford 2002.

Beutler, Beth. History of the Bretzel (Translation by Merry Gilliot) [http://edhelper.com/ReadingComprehension_43_57.html]

Booth, Gordon (Editor). Snack Food. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1990.

Brant, Tracy. The History of Pretzels [http://tracybrant.com/pretzel.html] Dec 4 2003

Bretzel For Bush. The origins of the Pretzel. [http://web.archive.org/web/003040223323/www.bretzelforbush.com/eng/index.php?root=]

Brezelbäcker - Brezelbäckerei. Brezelgeschichte" und Brezel "Dies und Das. [http://www.brezel-baecker.de/brezelgeschichte]

Bunch, Bryan and Hellemans, Alexander (Editors). The History of Science and Technology: A Browser’s Guide to the Great Discoveries, Inventions, and the People Who Made Them from the Dawn of Time to Today. Houghton Mifflin: Wilmington. 2004.

Claiborne, Craig. Craig Claiborne’s The New York Times Food Encyclopedia. Times Books: New York. 1985.

The Compact Edition of The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 1991.

Davidson, Alan. Oxford Companion to Food, 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press: Oxford. 2006.

Dallas, E.S. Kettner’s Book for the Table, facsimile reprint to 1877 edition. Centaur Press: London.
1968.

David, Elizabeth. English Bread and Yeast Cookery. Penguin: New York. 1979.

Dear Yahoo. Why are pretzels shaped so weird? [http://ask.yahoo.com/001 062 7.html] Wednesday June 7, 2001

Dictionary.com. Lexico Publishing Group [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pretzel] 2007.

The Different Twist Pretzel Company. Pretzel History. [http://www.differentpretzel.com/pretzelhistory.htm]

Digbie, Sir Kenelme, The Closet of the Eminently Learned Digbie Kt Opened: Whereby is Discovered Several ways for making of Metheglin, Sider, Cherry-Wine, &c. together with Excellent Directions for Cookery: As also for Preserving, Conserving, Candying, &c. London, 1669. Edited from the first edition by Stevenson, Jane and Davidson, Peter. Prospect Books: Gillford. 1997.

Foley, Michael P. Why Do Catholics Eat Fish on Friday?: The Catholic Origin to Just About Everything. Palgrave Macmillan: Boston. 2005.

Fusco, Mary Ann Castronovo. About Foods of the Season. Meditations and Prayers [http://www.cptryon.org/prayer/season/fusco.html] 2004.

Gale, Thomson. World of Invention. Thomson Corporation: New York. 2005.

Giacosa, Ilaria Gozzini. A Taste of Ancient Rome, translated by Anna Herklotz. University of Chicago: Chicago. 1992.

Hale, William Harlan. Horizon Cookbook and Illustrated History of Eating and Drinking though the Ages. American Heritage Publishing Company: New York. 1968.

Hammond Pretzel Bakery. How we make Hammond’s Pretzels: History of the Pretzel [http://www.hammondpretzels.com/Hammond%0Pretzel%0how.htm]

Hines, Mary Anne; Marshall, Gordon and Weaver, William Woys. The Larder Invaded: Reflections on Three Centuries of Philadelphia Food and Drink. Library Company of Philadelphia and Historical
Society of Pennsylvania: Philadephia. 1987.

Hofer’s of Helen. Pretzels: The History of the Pretzel [http://www.hofers.com/Pretzels.htm] 2006.

Hoseney, Carl. Principles of Cereal Science and Technology. St. Paul: American Association of Cereal
Chemists, 1994.

Jacobs, H. E. Six Thousand Years of Bread: Its Holy and Unholy History. The Lyons Press: Guilford. 997.

Joe’s Pastry: Baking News, Tips and History. Pretzel Myths. [http://www.joepastry.com/index.php?s=pretzel&submit=Search]

Kaufman, William I. The Catholic Cookbook: Traditional Feast and Fast Day Recipes. The Citadel Press: NY. 1965.

Krupp, Christina M. Comments recorded on Stefan’s Florilegium. Posted on rec.org.sca on 7 Jan 005 09:03:8 -0500. Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks]pretzels [was bagels] [http://www.florilegium.org/files/FOOD-BREADS/pretzels-msg.html]

Macrae, R. (Editor). Encyclopedia of Food Science, Food Technology and Nutrition. San Diego: Academic Press, 1993.

Mariani, John F. Encyclopedia of American Food and Drink. Lebhar-Friedman: New York. 1999.

Mr Breakfast. Doughnuts: A Definitive History [http://www.mrbreakfast.com/article.asp?articleid=8]

National Pretzel Bakers Institute. The History of the Pretzel [http://www.kitchenproject.com/history/Pretzel.htm] March 2003.

The New York Carver. Medieval Inventions: The Pretzel [http://www.newyorkcarver.com/inventions5A.
htm]

Olver, Lynne. Food Timeline-- history notes: bread [http://www.foodtimeline.org/foodbreads.html#pretzels] 2000.

OSO-ONO Foods. All About the History; Evolution of Fried Doughs [http://home.comcast.net/~osoono/history.htm]

Riley, Phillip. History of the Pretzel Until the 1600s [http://www.geocities.com/phillipriley/2 005_09_01 _archive.html] September 5, 2005.

Roland Murten AG. The History of the Pretzel [http://www.roland.ch/produkte/bretzeli/index_en.php?lang=en]

Rolling Pretzel Company. And Now A Little Pretzel History. [http://www.wererolling.com/html/fun.html]

Rosten, Leo. Joys of Yiddish. Pocket Books: New York. 1970.

Sache, Ivan. Presentation of Saint-Florentin. Saint-Florentin (Municipality, Yonne, France) [http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/fr-89-sf.html] December 23. 2006.

Shapiro, Gary. Of Treasure & Trash. New York Sun. July 4, 2006. [http://www.nysun.com/article/
36070]

Snack Food Association. The History of the Pretzel [http://www.kitchenproject.com/history/Pretzel.htm]

Stanley, Judy. The Pretzel Has a Holy History. The Everett Herald: November 5, 2003 [http://www.food-lists.com/lists/archives/clipping-cooking/003//068569049.php]

Stradley, Linda. Linda’s Culinary Dictionary: A Dictionary and History of Cooking, Food, and Beverage Terms. [http://whatscookingamerica.net/Glossary/P.htm]

Sturgis Pretzel House. Pretzel History [http://www.sturgispretzel.com/PrezHist.htm] 2000.

Sullo, Eleanor. Pretzel history: some little known facts. Essortment Home. Pagewise. [http://oh.essortment.com/pretzelhistory_raxn.htm] 2002.

Toussaint-Samat, Maguelonne. History of Food. Translated from the French bu Anthea Bell. Barnes & Noble Books. 1992.

Women for Faith & Family. The Observance of Lent. Voices Online Edition: Lent - Easter 001 , Volume XVI, No. [http://www.wf-f.org/0301 LENT.html]

Wikipedia. Johannes Kepler [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_Kepler]

Wikipedia. Pretzel [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breze]

Image References


Image 1: The Last Supper. Ottonian, Regensburg, about 030 - 040. From MS. Ludwig VII , FOL. 38. From The J. Paul Getty Trust. [http://www.getty.edu/art/collection/objects/3194/unknown-maker-the-last-supper-ottonian-about-1030-1040/]

Image 2 : Queen Esther and Ahasuerus at a banquet, including a pretzel. From the 12th century Hortus Deliciarum. From Wikipedia. [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Hortus_deliciarum#/media/File:Hortus_Deliciarum_1190.jpg]

Image 3: Job Berckheyde, The Baker, about 1681. From Worcester Art Museum [http://www.worcesterart.org/Exhibitions/Past/favorite_baker.html]

Image 4: Merchant’s stall. c. 483. From A Feast For The Eyes [http://www.godecookery.com/afeast/kitchens/kit010.html]

Image 5: Bakers. From A Feast For The Eyes [http://www.godecookery.com/afeast/kitchens/kit044.html]

Image 6: Guards with Pretzels. Unknown source: found on web site and did not notate the URL.

Image 7: Close up of The Fight Between Carnival and Lent. by Pieter Brueghel. From The Web Gallery of Art. [http://www.artchive.com/artchive/B/bruegel/carnival_and_lent.jpg.html]

Image 8: Pretzel making in the New World: 17th Century New Amsterdam. From Pretzel House. [http://www.sturgispretzel.com/PrezHist.htm]

Image 9: Detail from the Hours of Catherine of Cleves. From The New York Carver. Medieval Inventions:
The Pretzel [http://www.newyorkcarver.com/inventions5A.htm] [http://www.themorgan.org/collection/hours-of-catherine-of-cleves/87]

Image 10: The retrograde motion of Mars relative to Earth, from Astronomia. From Wikipedia [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_Kepler#/media/File:Kepler_Mars_retrograde.jpg]


-------------------------------------------------------------


Observations from 2015:

This was both a fun and frustrating research project. I found a lot of evidence for pretzels in art but nothing from any period source about them. Only legends, myths and nonsense. My paper does "rely" on less then accurate sources, such as Wikipedia, because I had no better sources to work from. I basically gave up during the research phase and just started listing the myths and legends, each one dumber then the last. I left out dozens of period images of the pretzel and left out some whoppers of origin stories. 

There is the legend that the pretzel was invented in Vienna in the early 16th century, during a Turkish siege. Bakers, who were up early baking bread, heard the Turkish sappers and either alerted the city guards or lay in ambush for the invaders. The pretzel, was then created in honor of the saving of the city, with the shape representing the defeat of Islam. I'm calling major BS on this one. 1) We have evidence of the existence of the pretzel before the 1529 siege of Vienna. 2) There is nothing to tie the shape of the pretzel with Islam or with any of the Ottoman attackers. 3) This is the exact same story that is told about the origin of the croissant. The croissant story is almost equally unlikely (a French pastry invented to celebrate the victory of a Austrian city) but at least the French can tie the shape of the croissant to the Islamic crescent. 

There is a variation to the story that only soft pretzels existed before 1529. The bakers were baking pretzels (during a siege, as you do) and they over cooked while the bakers were fighting off the Turks. After the battle, the bakers discovered that the pretzels had been baked rock hard, but they ate them any ways, and enjoyed them. A third variation was that the Turks had captured the church of St. Stephen and had hung a crescent banner from the spire. When the Turks were defeated, a baker had climbed up to the spire, removed the banner and hung a pretzel. In honor of this, The Emperor of Austria bestowed a coat of arms to the pretzel bakers, containing a pretzel.  I can't buy this either.

Another legend tells that people were once married by holding on to a pretzel. The shape somehow indicates the union of two people as equals. Which is why pretzels have three holes? Ah, says several sources, the man and wife hold on to the large holes, since they are equals in the marriage, and the priest holds on to the small hole. 1) There is no contemporary evidence for this. 2) Men and women were not considered equal in the middle ages. 3) We do have plenty of surviving liturgy handbooks from the Catholic and Protestant churches that detail the exact steps in a marriage ceremony, and none list pretzels. 

In the years since I wrote this paper, I have been keeping my eyes open for better references. There haven't been many. Max Rampolt's Ein New Kuchbuch (1581) contains the following recipe:

Precedella
55. Nimm ein schönes Mehl/ lauter Eierdotter/ und ein wenig Wein/ Zucker und Aniß/ mach ein Teig damit an/ walg jn fein länglicht und rundt mit saubern Händen/ und mach kleine Bretzel darauß/ scheubs in ein warmen Ofen/ und backs/ daß du es nit verbrennest/ sondern fein außtrucknet/ so werden sie auch mürb und gut. Du magst auch Zimmet darunter nemmen oder nicht. Und man nennet es Precedella. 
55. Take a fair flour/ clean egg yolks/ and a little wine/ sugar and anise/ make a dough with it/ roll it nicely long and round with clean hands/ and make little pretzels from it/ shove in a warm oven and bake/ that you do not burn it/ but until nicely dry/ like this they will be also crispy and good. You might also take cinnamon with it or not. And one calls them Precedella. 

This isn't a recipe for pretzels, but for a sweet pastry that is rolled and twisted like a pretzel. I also came across another 16th century recipe that is for something like marzipan twisted into pretzel shapes. But, it does indicate that the pretzel was so common that no instructions needed to be given other than "make little pretzels". The writer assumed that the reader would already know how to twist dough into a pretzel shape. 

I have found a few period sources that mention pretzels; one was a Polish handbook on Lent that recommended that pretzels only be consumed every other day. But, no recipes. And no complaints. People complained in the middle ages as much as they do today. There are tons of period sources of people complaining about food. The English complained, when traveling, that no one knew how to roast. The French complained that they had to share cups with other diners. The Italians complained about the barbaric foods of the north. People commented on the food they were exposed to in letters home and we can find plenty of records detailing table manner and regional variety of food, including bread: the Spanish disliked the German heavy, black rye bread and everyone complained about the bread in those areas of France that had sky-high taxes on salt. 

People complained, also, about lent, particularly about the food that couldn't be eaten. We have plenty of letters and notes of people pining for bacon or beef during lent. I found a marginalia scribble from a monk saying something along the lines of "I hate lent. I would kill a man for just one egg and some ale."  But, no one complained about pretzels. I cannot find one single reference of anyone complaining that the pretzels tasted different during lent, or that the pretzels of Poland were different than those of Castile. One would think that if pretzels were made with sugar and eggs and spices year round, except during lent, where they were made with nothing more than flour, water and yeast, that someone would have complained that they can't wait to have a "proper" pretzel after lent. 

Personally, I think the pretzel was developed by a monk using only the most basic of ingredients, rolled into a stick to give it maximum surface area, and then twisted so that it would not be confused with round breads and sweets. The twisted shape allows the pretzel to be hung, as seen in many period illustrations. The recipe and procedure could have been communicated monk to monk and they traveled between monasteries. The "secret" could easily been learned by secular bakers who took advantage of the cheap nature of the pretzel. Soft or hard, the high ratio of surface area to volume makes the pretzel crunchy and chewy without being heavy.

From my own experiments, I think boiling the pretzels in salt water makes for a soft pretzel. I think that the boiling water gelatinizes the outer layer of starch and helps the dough retain water. As the water turns into steam, the dough puffs up. The same dough, cooked at the same temperature for the same period of time, will give a soft or hard pretzel based on which dough was boiled. 

I should revisit this project and concentrate solely on methods of making the pretzels. Mistress Katja was one of my judges and she said that my pretzels were yummy, which is very high praise, indeed.